You are here: Home / Make Money Online Free / Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State

Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State

July 10, 2010 By admin 25 Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State
  • services sprite Constitution Lecture 9: Separation of Church and State

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Filed Under: Make Money Online Free Tagged With: , , , ,

About admin

Comments

  1. orawal says:
    July 10, 2010 at 11:21 pm

    that was insightful and very interesting, and funny at times too!

  2. orawal says:
    July 10, 2010 at 11:31 pm

    “Mind your business” LMAO!!

  3. raptorkiller2k5 says:
    July 10, 2010 at 11:42 pm

    @neoverse. Anyone who wants to limit another’s freedom to marry is a bigot. Unless the arrangement is actually harmful to society, the state has no right meddling in one’s private affairs. You should be acknowledging that you want to force your opinions onto others, despite they not posing harm to you. Someone who believes in, or is considering gay marriage isn’t harming another.

    PS: I really find it disturbing that terms such as “bigotry” is treated as a slur. You are one, buddy.

  4. shanedk says:
    July 11, 2010 at 12:08 am

    @UnmaskedTuxedo No, I quoted the ENTIRETY of that section. That’s all there is to it.

  5. UnmaskedTuxedo says:
    July 11, 2010 at 12:56 am

    Uh-oooooh! You quote-mined the article of Tripoli! ALERT! ALERT! DISHONESTY CAUGHT!

  6. ceezmad1 says:
    July 11, 2010 at 1:42 am

    @Eye2EyeIIIV I think you have your facts wrong, they are being told about other religions, they are not told to ” turn toward Mecca & pray and “that’s not a violation of separation – that’s okay. Because they’re learning new cultures & all. ”

    I do feel that it may be a violation if they are being told that one religion (or no rreligion) is better than any other.

  7. shanedk says:
    July 11, 2010 at 2:31 am

    @Eye2EyeIIIV Sure, they can. They just can’t get the school to do it officially.

  8. Eye2EyeIIIV says:
    July 11, 2010 at 3:23 am

    And do you think that it’s an accident toward ALL that’s going on??? Christian people being questioned, being DRIVEN OUT – and meanwhile, you have teachers who are actually getting their students to learn about feel Islam, so that they’ll turn toward Mecca & pray and “that’s not a violation of separation – that’s okay. Because they’re learning new cultures & all. “

  9. Eye2EyeIIIV says:
    July 11, 2010 at 3:58 am

    These days, people who are of Christian positions cannot kneel down with one another to pray before a football game at school, for example, & pray to their Lord G-d, & liberals wanna pretend that that’s some “violation” of “separation of Church & State”, a doctrine by the way found NO WHERE in the Constitution of the United States.

  10. jamierourketen says:
    July 11, 2010 at 4:43 am

    ”religion and government will both exist in greater purity,the less they are mixed together. . . . . . if tyranny and oppression come to this land,it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy”. . . JAMES MADISON,4th president of the united states.

  11. OnTheFritz602 says:
    July 11, 2010 at 5:14 am

    Excellent video!
    Sarah Palin and Billy O’ need to watch this.
    I recently watched the two of them absolutely butcher the Constitution and the Founding Fathers intents etc. Was like watching dumb and dumber, but then again it was Fox, and they have propaganda to spread to their target audience.
    The topic started out about the National Day of Prayer.

  12. Paulwhoisvegan says:
    July 11, 2010 at 5:33 am

    @helpvidz I love this channel as well!!

  13. ceezmad1 says:
    July 11, 2010 at 6:27 am

    @shanedk Really, the person is causing panic and that could cause someone to get hurt, I am sure that I could sue that person for making creating panic, perhaps just civil case but no criminal case. I am sure not going to try testing it :)

    I guess that if no one gets hurt then it is just a joke, like they say it is funny until someone gets hurt.

  14. shanedk says:
    July 11, 2010 at 6:58 am

    @ceezmad1 No, there’s nothing illegal about it at all.

  15. ceezmad1 says:
    July 11, 2010 at 7:19 am

    @DaveC86 “shouting fire in a public building would not be an issue if all property were private”

    This makes no sense to me, correct me if I am wrong, theaters are private property, but it is still illegal to scream fire (when there is none) because of the harm that could cause to people by causing panic.

  16. ceezmad1 says:
    July 11, 2010 at 7:24 am

    @interstate317

    1 like this rating better.
    2 the religious ones probably do say the new pledge.
    3 no

  17. concisefitness says:
    July 11, 2010 at 8:04 am

    case closed

  18. helpvidz says:
    July 11, 2010 at 8:35 am

    I love this channel, thank you so much.

  19. Altimadark says:
    July 11, 2010 at 9:33 am

    @shanedk I’m always forgetting some important detail; thanks for clarifying that one for me. I appreciate it.

  20. shanedk says:
    July 11, 2010 at 9:39 am

    @Altimadark It wasn’t just two of the founders. It passed the Senate unanimously, and it was published without any recorded dissent whatsoever.

  21. Altimadark says:
    July 11, 2010 at 10:28 am

    Treaty of Tripoli FTW, Shane. It’s hard to argue “The Founders wanted it to be Christian” when two of the most well-known of them flat-out disagree.

  22. shanedk says:
    July 11, 2010 at 11:00 am

    @leesec1 And in what way do I have a hard time understanding this?

  23. leesec1 says:
    July 11, 2010 at 11:49 am

    Here’s what this guy is having a hard time understanding: The founders were religious men, they did not however want a Theocracy because there were several different denominations of Christianity among the people and the founders, to keep it fair so Baptist wouldn’t be favored above Methodist or Catholics, Inserted the establishment cause in the first amendment, notice there is a free exercise clause there to to ensure people would have the right to practice their belief’s in the public square.

  24. neoverse says:
    July 11, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    @Elitistb616 What research would I need to do? I’m not against prop 8. If you feel a law was broken get off your butt and call the ALCU or something, If not then sit down and stop whining. Stop trying to demonize people because I don’t agree with you. I think you do need to stop posting because your not being logical.

  25. Elitistb616 says:
    July 11, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    @neoverse

    This, it appears, is the end. You have shown a steadfast refusal to actually do any investigation or research on issues you repeatedly espouse an opinion on. You know little to nothing of the actual contents of the Constitution, the basis behind taxes, nor even the definition of the word bigotry. You throw out phrases like “evidently people who want to pass laws to get their way are the ones who don’t like freedom”, not even seeing the inherent irony of your position.

Speak Your Mind

*